THE Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 has, predictably, ignited a firestorm of debate across the country’s political landscape. On one end, the government defends the Bill as a “modernisation” of our governance architecture, citing the need for policy continuity and alignment with regional standards. On the other, opposition voices and civil society groups view the…
To access this content, please purchase a subscription by clicking the button below and select a package of your choice!
Subscriptions